Need printable brackets? Get 2008 NCAA men's basketball tournament brackets. Need a job? We're hiring.

BCS Bowl Breakdown: Orange Bowl

Contributing writer Matt Woods breaks down this year’s college football BCS Bowl games. In this post: the Orange Bowl.

Read the full article -- No comments »

Recent Articles:
BCS Breakdown: The National Championship Game
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Orange Bowl
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Fiesta Bowl
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Rose Bowl

Home Advantage

By division
Last Updated Sun Jan 27 12:54:24 PST 2008

Home Advantage = 2.9

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
1. Connecticut (8-4)13.5
2. Miami (OH) (6-7)13.4
3. Tennessee (10-4)12.5
4. North Texas (2-10)12.2
5. Kansas State (4-7)12.0
6. Tulsa (10-4)11.7
7. UTEP (3-8)11.6
8. San Jose State (4-7)11.5
9. BYU (10-2)10.7
10. Wyoming (5-7)9.9

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
11. Hawaii (10-1)9.6
12. Marshall (3-8)9.3
13. Boise State (9-3)9.0
14. South Florida (8-4)8.9
15. Nevada (5-7)8.9
16. Wisconsin (8-4)8.8
17. Toledo (4-7)8.5
18. Central Florida (10-4)8.2
19. California (7-6)7.8
20. Iowa State (3-8)7.8

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
21. North Carolina (3-8)7.7
22. Arkansas State (5-7)7.6
23. West Kentucky (1-5)7.5
24. Louisiana Tech (4-7)7.0
25. Indiana (6-6)6.7
26. Texas A&M (6-6)6.6
27. Washington State (5-7)6.5
28. Texas Tech (8-4)6.4
29. UCLA (6-7)6.1
30. New Mexico (8-4)6.1

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
31. Penn State (9-4)6.0
32. Fresno State (8-4)5.9
33. Georgia (10-2)5.7
34. Oklahoma State (6-6)5.7
35. Wake Forest (9-4)5.6
36. Arizona State (10-3)5.4
37. Army (2-9)5.4
38. Oregon (9-4)5.2
39. TCU (8-5)5.1
40. Virginia (9-4)5.1

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
41. Temple (4-8)5.1
42. Arizona (4-7)4.9
43. Utah (9-4)4.9
44. UNLV (2-10)4.9
45. Colorado (6-7)4.8
46. Oklahoma (11-3)4.6
47. East Carolina (8-5)4.5
48. Akron (4-8)4.4
49. Florida Intl (1-11)4.3
50. Northern Illinois (2-9)4.2

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
51. Georgia Tech (6-6)4.2
52. Iowa (6-6)4.2
53. Purdue (7-5)4.1
54. Troy St (8-4)3.7
55. New Mexico State (2-9)3.7
56. Minnesota (1-10)3.6
57. UAB (1-10)3.6
58. Buffalo (5-7)3.3
59. Maryland (5-7)3.2
60. Rutgers (7-5)3.2

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
61. Ohio (5-6)3.1
62. Bowling Green (8-5)2.6
63. Air Force (8-4)2.6
64. Alabama (6-6)2.5
65. Mississippi (2-9)2.5
66. Michigan State (7-6)2.4
67. Illinois (8-4)2.3
68. Texas (10-3)2.3
69. Clemson (8-4)2.1
70. Nebraska (5-7)2.0

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
71. LSU (12-2)1.7
72. Washington (4-9)1.7
73. Tulane (3-8)1.7
74. Houston (7-5)1.5
75. USC (11-2)1.4
76. SMU (1-11)1.4
77. Miami (5-7)1.2
78. Idaho (0-11)1.2
79. Florida (9-4)1.2
80. Pittsburgh (4-7)1.1

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
81. Colorado State (2-9)1.0
82. Arkansas (7-5)0.9
83. Cincinnati (9-3)0.9
84. Oregon State (8-4)0.8
85. Eastern Michigan (3-8)0.7
86. Mississippi State (7-5)0.6
87. San Diego State (3-8)0.4
88. Florida State (7-6)0.2
89. Kentucky (7-5)0.0
90. South Carolina (5-6)0.0

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
91. Auburn (8-4)-0.1
92. Syracuse (2-10)-0.3
93. North Carolina State (4-7)-0.3
94. Baylor (2-9)-0.4
95. Rice (3-8)-0.7
96. Vanderbilt (4-7)-0.9
97. Memphis (6-6)-1.4
98. Central Michigan (8-5)-1.4
99. Northwestern (5-6)-1.5
100. Louisville (5-6)-1.6

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
101. Michigan (9-3)-2.5
102. Ball State (7-6)-2.7
103. Navy (8-4)-3.0
104. Stanford (4-8)-3.3
105. Louisiana-Lafayette (3-8)-3.5
106. Duke (1-11)-3.8
107. Boston College (10-3)-3.9
108. Western Michigan (4-7)-4.0
109. Louisiana-Monroe (5-6)-4.0
110. Fla Atlantic (8-5)-4.1

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
111. Kansas (11-1)-4.3
112. West Virginia (11-2)-4.6
113. Virginia Tech (10-3)-4.7
114. Missouri (11-2)-4.7
115. Middle Tenn. St (5-7)-4.9
116. Notre Dame (3-9)-5.4
117. Ohio State (10-2)-5.7
118. Kent (2-9)-6.1
119. Utah State (2-10)-7.0
120. Southern Miss (6-6)-8.4
Google

Team Rankings Web

Copyright 2000-2008 Team Rankings, LLC. All rights reserved. All content on this site is produced for entertainment purposes only and is not intended to be used in direct or indirect violation of any local, state, federal, or international law(s). By using this site, you agree and consent to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.