Conference Downward Stability

By ranking
Last Updated Sun Jan 27 12:54:24 PST 2008

Home Court Advantage = 2.9

AVERAGE = 1.124


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
2. Oregon (9-4)1.381
4. UCLA (6-7)1.304
6. California (7-6)1.264
13. Arizona State (10-3)1.192
19. Washington (4-9)1.160
27. Oregon State (8-4)1.122
44. Arizona (4-7)1.020
58. USC (11-2)0.967
64. Stanford (4-8)0.917
73. Washington State (5-7)0.908


AVERAGE = 1.058


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
1. Virginia (9-4)1.394
7. Wake Forest (9-4)1.249
8. Clemson (8-4)1.235
14. Maryland (5-7)1.181
26. Boston College (10-3)1.122
29. Florida State (7-6)1.117
34. Georgia Tech (6-6)1.082
41. Virginia Tech (10-3)1.047
43. North Carolina State (4-7)1.021
80. Miami (5-7)0.872
82. North Carolina (3-8)0.851
115. Duke (1-11)0.522


AVERAGE = 1.006


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
3. Tennessee (10-4)1.327
11. Kentucky (7-5)1.210
21. Florida (9-4)1.141
24. Alabama (6-6)1.125
40. Arkansas (7-5)1.056
45. LSU (12-2)1.016
46. Auburn (8-4)1.012
51. Georgia (10-2)0.987
56. Mississippi State (7-5)0.969
61. South Carolina (5-6)0.947
97. Vanderbilt (4-7)0.745
113. Mississippi (2-9)0.542


AVERAGE = 0.985


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
5. Miami (OH) (6-7)1.279
9. Bowling Green (8-5)1.223
10. Buffalo (5-7)1.219
22. Ohio (5-6)1.137
30. Ball State (7-6)1.110
47. Central Michigan (8-5)1.001
62. Akron (4-8)0.944
70. Western Michigan (4-7)0.911
71. Temple (4-8)0.911
74. Toledo (4-7)0.907
91. Eastern Michigan (3-8)0.826
100. Kent (2-9)0.698
107. Northern Illinois (2-9)0.642


AVERAGE = 0.972


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
17. Michigan State (7-6)1.164
25. Purdue (7-5)1.125
32. Penn State (9-4)1.103
35. Michigan (9-3)1.078
38. Indiana (6-6)1.072
49. Iowa (6-6)0.994
59. Illinois (8-4)0.967
65. Wisconsin (8-4)0.917
79. Ohio State (10-2)0.879
87. Northwestern (5-6)0.845
112. Minnesota (1-10)0.548


AVERAGE = 0.967


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
20. Utah (9-4)1.158
23. TCU (8-5)1.133
28. Air Force (8-4)1.118
42. BYU (10-2)1.023
55. Wyoming (5-7)0.970
57. New Mexico (8-4)0.969
88. San Diego State (3-8)0.839
92. Colorado State (2-9)0.811
103. UNLV (2-10)0.684


AVERAGE = 0.940


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
15. South Florida (8-4)1.173
33. Rutgers (7-5)1.082
48. Connecticut (8-4)0.996
53. Cincinnati (9-3)0.976
60. Louisville (5-6)0.952
78. West Virginia (11-2)0.880
89. Pittsburgh (4-7)0.836
108. Syracuse (2-10)0.622


AVERAGE = 0.900


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
12. Texas (10-3)1.193
31. Oklahoma State (6-6)1.110
36. Colorado (6-7)1.077
37. Texas A&M (6-6)1.076
50. Oklahoma (11-3)0.989
72. Missouri (11-2)0.908
75. Nebraska (5-7)0.897
77. Texas Tech (8-4)0.882
84. Kansas State (4-7)0.850
104. Kansas (11-1)0.679
105. Iowa State (3-8)0.666
117. Baylor (2-9)0.475


AVERAGE = 0.858


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
16. Memphis (6-6)1.171
18. East Carolina (8-5)1.161
54. Tulsa (10-4)0.975
66. Tulane (3-8)0.916
67. Houston (7-5)0.913
69. Southern Miss (6-6)0.911
83. Rice (3-8)0.850
93. UTEP (3-8)0.802
98. Marshall (3-8)0.712
110. SMU (1-11)0.581
118. UAB (1-10)0.442


AVERAGE = 0.766


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
76. Fla Atlantic (8-5)0.889
81. Middle Tenn. St (5-7)0.871
86. Arkansas State (5-7)0.848
94. Louisiana-Monroe (5-6)0.798
95. Troy St (8-4)0.765
96. Louisiana-Lafayette (3-8)0.764
101. North Texas (2-10)0.693
116. Florida Intl (1-11)0.499


AVERAGE = 0.694


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
52. Navy (8-4)0.984
90. Notre Dame (3-9)0.832
109. Army (2-9)0.602
119. West Kentucky (1-5)0.355


AVERAGE = 0.676


Team
 Rating 
vs. Top 10
vs. 11-25
vs. 26-40
63. Nevada (5-7)0.919
68. Fresno State (8-4)0.912
85. Boise State (9-3)0.849
99. Louisiana Tech (4-7)0.699
102. San Jose State (4-7)0.688
106. Utah State (2-10)0.655
111. Hawaii (10-1)0.578
114. New Mexico State (2-9)0.528
120. Idaho (0-11)0.259
Google

Team Rankings Web
Copyright 2000-2008 Team Rankings, LLC. All rights reserved. All content on this site is produced for entertainment purposes only and is not intended to be used in direct or indirect violation of any local, state, federal, or international law(s). By using this site, you agree and consent to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.