BCS Bowl Breakdown: Orange Bowl

Contributing writer Matt Woods breaks down this year’s college football BCS Bowl games. In this post: the Orange Bowl.

Read the full article -- No comments »

Recent Articles:
BCS Breakdown: The National Championship Game
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Orange Bowl
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Fiesta Bowl
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Rose Bowl

Home Advantage

By division
Last Updated Tue Jan 09 01:15:11 EST 2007

Home Advantage = 3.0

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
1. Boston College (9-3)18.5
2. Rutgers (10-2)13.9
3. UCLA (7-6)13.1
4. SMU (5-6)12.6
5. Nevada (8-5)12.0
6. Ohio State (12-1)11.7
7. Kansas State (6-6)11.7
8. BYU (11-2)10.9
9. Louisville (12-1)9.4
10. Boise State (12-0)9.2

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
11. Missouri (7-5)8.9
12. Utah (7-5)8.8
13. California (9-3)8.7
14. USC (11-2)8.7
15. Kansas (5-6)8.6
16. Minnesota (5-7)8.3
17. Toledo (4-7)8.1
18. UNLV (1-10)8.1
19. North Carolina State (2-9)7.9
20. Temple (1-11)7.7

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
21. Kent (6-6)7.6
22. Eastern Michigan (1-11)7.5
23. Marshall (4-7)7.4
24. Miami (6-6)7.4
25. Virginia (5-7)7.3
26. Iowa State (3-8)7.2
27. San Jose State (8-4)6.9
28. North Carolina (2-9)6.9
29. Fresno State (4-8)6.8
30. Buffalo (2-10)6.5

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
31. Oregon (6-6)6.5
32. New Mexico State (2-8)6.4
33. Cincinnati (7-5)6.3
34. Houston (9-4)6.3
35. Oklahoma State (6-6)6.1
36. Colorado (2-9)6.1
37. Florida (12-1)6.0
38. San Diego State (3-8)5.9
39. Tulane (4-8)5.9
40. Wyoming (6-6)5.6

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
41. Akron (5-7)5.6
42. Mississippi (3-8)5.4
43. Purdue (7-6)5.4
44. New Mexico (6-6)5.4
45. Indiana (5-6)5.3
46. Colorado State (3-8)5.2
47. TCU (10-2)5.0
48. UAB (3-9)4.9
49. Utah State (1-11)4.5
50. Nebraska (8-5)4.3

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
51. Central Michigan (10-4)4.3
52. Tulsa (7-5)4.3
53. Air Force (4-8)4.0
54. Rice (7-6)4.0
55. Western Michigan (8-5)3.9
56. Alabama (6-7)3.9
57. Notre Dame (10-3)3.8
58. Arkansas State (6-6)3.6
59. Michigan (11-2)3.6
60. Southern Miss (8-5)3.6

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
61. East Carolina (7-6)3.5
62. South Florida (8-4)3.4
63. Kentucky (7-5)3.2
64. Syracuse (4-8)3.2
65. Tennessee (9-4)3.0
66. Iowa (5-7)2.9
67. Baylor (3-8)2.9
68. Hawaii (10-3)2.9
69. Virginia Tech (9-3)2.8
70. Idaho (3-8)2.5

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
71. Texas Tech (7-5)2.4
72. Georgia Tech (8-5)2.3
73. LSU (11-2)2.3
74. Wisconsin (11-1)2.1
75. Connecticut (3-8)2.1
76. Oregon State (9-4)1.5
77. Fla Atlantic (4-7)1.3
78. Florida State (7-6)1.2
79. UTEP (5-7)1.1
80. Clemson (8-5)0.8

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
81. North Texas (3-9)0.8
82. Oklahoma (11-3)0.6
83. Arizona State (6-6)0.5
84. Bowling Green (4-8)0.5
85. Auburn (11-2)0.5
86. West Virginia (10-2)0.4
87. Maryland (8-4)0.3
88. Northern Illinois (6-6)0.0
89. Louisiana Tech (2-10)-0.0
90. Vanderbilt (3-8)-0.3

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
91. Central Florida (3-8)-0.7
92. Arkansas (9-4)-0.7
93. Duke (0-11)-0.9
94. Army (2-9)-1.1
95. Ball State (5-6)-1.9
96. Arizona (5-6)-2.1
97. Ohio (8-5)-2.5
98. Troy St (7-5)-3.1
99. Penn State (8-4)-3.1
100. Washington State (6-6)-3.3

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
101. Texas (9-3)-3.7
102. Pittsburgh (5-6)-3.7
103. Louisiana-Monroe (3-8)-3.7
104. Texas A&M (8-4)-3.8
105. Northwestern (4-7)-4.2
106. Washington (5-7)-4.3
107. Memphis (1-10)-4.3
108. Florida Intl (0-12)-4.3
109. Illinois (1-10)-4.5
110. Middle Tenn. St (6-6)-4.5

Team

 Rating 

v. Top 10

v. 11-25

v. 26-40
111. Louisiana-Lafayette (5-6)-4.6
112. Miami (OH) (2-10)-5.1
113. Navy (8-4)-5.1
114. Michigan State (4-8)-5.7
115. Wake Forest (10-3)-7.0
116. South Carolina (7-5)-7.4
117. Georgia (8-4)-9.6
118. Mississippi State (2-9)-9.8
119. Stanford (1-11)-12.1
Google

Team Rankings Web

Copyright 2000-2008 Team Rankings, LLC. All rights reserved. All content on this site is produced for entertainment purposes only and is not intended to be used in direct or indirect violation of any local, state, federal, or international law(s). By using this site, you agree and consent to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.