College Football Bowl Game Predictions are up!

BCS Bowl Breakdown: Orange Bowl

Contributing writer Matt Woods breaks down this year’s college football BCS Bowl games. In this post: the Orange Bowl.

Read the full article -- No comments »

Recent Articles:
BCS Breakdown: The National Championship Game
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Orange Bowl
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Fiesta Bowl
BCS Bowl Breakdown: Rose Bowl

Wins Rating for Points Rating

By division
Last Updated Tue Jan 09 01:15:11 EST 2007

Home Advantage = 3.0

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
1. Boise State (12-0)77.8
2. Florida (12-1)56.7
3. Ohio State (12-1)50.8
4. Louisville (12-1)50.7
5. Wisconsin (11-1)50.4
6. LSU (11-2)48.0
7. USC (11-2)48.0
8. Michigan (11-2)46.3
9. Auburn (11-2)45.9
10. West Virginia (10-2)43.9

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
11. Rutgers (10-2)43.2
12. BYU (11-2)42.2
13. California (9-3)41.7
14. Notre Dame (10-3)41.4
15. Arkansas (9-4)40.4
16. Oregon State (9-4)40.1
17. Oklahoma (11-3)40.0
18. Wake Forest (10-3)39.6
19. Tennessee (9-4)39.4
20. TCU (10-2)38.4

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
21. Georgia (8-4)37.8
22. Texas (9-3)37.8
23. Boston College (9-3)37.5
24. Penn State (8-4)37.5
25. Virginia Tech (9-3)36.9
26. Kentucky (7-5)36.5
27. Hawaii (10-3)34.9
28. South Carolina (7-5)34.7
29. South Florida (8-4)34.6
30. Cincinnati (7-5)34.4

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
31. Maryland (8-4)34.4
32. Texas A&M (8-4)33.5
33. Nebraska (8-5)32.8
34. UCLA (7-6)32.0
35. Arizona (5-6)31.9
36. Georgia Tech (8-5)31.9
37. Oregon (6-6)31.2
38. Arizona State (6-6)30.8
39. Central Michigan (10-4)30.5
40. Texas Tech (7-5)30.4

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
41. Clemson (8-5)29.9
42. Houston (9-4)29.5
43. Washington State (6-6)29.4
44. Navy (8-4)28.7
45. Utah (7-5)28.5
46. Missouri (7-5)28.5
47. San Jose State (8-4)28.1
48. Southern Miss (8-5)28.1
49. Purdue (7-6)27.7
50. Florida State (7-6)27.6

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
51. Oklahoma State (6-6)27.4
52. Washington (5-7)27.0
53. Miami (6-6)27.0
54. Kansas State (6-6)26.6
55. Alabama (6-7)25.7
56. Minnesota (5-7)25.4
57. Tulsa (7-5)25.2
58. Nevada (8-5)25.1
59. Indiana (5-6)25.1
60. Western Michigan (8-5)24.7

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
61. Ohio (8-5)24.5
62. Pittsburgh (5-6)24.4
63. East Carolina (7-6)24.4
64. Rice (7-6)24.2
65. Wyoming (6-6)23.8
66. Troy St (7-5)23.6
67. Iowa (5-7)23.0
68. New Mexico (6-6)22.7
69. Kansas (5-6)22.6
70. Middle Tenn. St (6-6)21.9

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
71. Virginia (5-7)21.9
72. Mississippi (3-8)21.4
73. Syracuse (4-8)21.4
74. Northwestern (4-7)21.0
75. Vanderbilt (3-8)20.4
76. Northern Illinois (6-6)20.2
77. Connecticut (3-8)19.5
78. Baylor (3-8)18.3
79. Ball State (5-6)18.2
80. SMU (5-6)18.1

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
81. Michigan State (4-8)17.9
82. Arkansas State (6-6)17.8
83. Air Force (4-8)17.3
84. Marshall (4-7)16.8
85. Louisiana-Lafayette (5-6)16.4
86. Tulane (4-8)16.1
87. UTEP (5-7)16.0
88. Iowa State (3-8)15.9
89. Mississippi State (2-9)15.6
90. Kent (6-6)15.4

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
91. San Diego State (3-8)15.4
92. North Carolina (2-9)14.9
93. Fla Atlantic (4-7)14.9
94. Akron (5-7)14.8
95. Fresno State (4-8)14.3
96. Toledo (4-7)14.2
97. Central Florida (3-8)14.0
98. Colorado State (3-8)13.7
99. Colorado (2-9)12.3
100. Idaho (3-8)11.7

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
101. North Carolina State (2-9)11.7
102. Stanford (1-11)11.5
103. Louisiana-Monroe (3-8)11.2
104. UAB (3-9)10.6
105. Bowling Green (4-8)8.7
106. Army (2-9)8.1
107. North Texas (3-9)5.8
108. New Mexico State (2-8)5.2
109. Illinois (1-10)5.1
110. Miami (OH) (2-10)4.8

Team
 Rating 
v. Top 10
v. 11-25
v. 26-40
111. Louisiana Tech (2-10)4.7
112. UNLV (1-10)4.3
113. Buffalo (2-10)3.8
114. Memphis (1-10)1.4
115. Temple (1-11)0.9
116. Utah State (1-11)-0.8
117. Eastern Michigan (1-11)-1.6
118. Duke (0-11)-24.9
119. Florida Intl (0-12)-33.3
Google

Team Rankings Web
Copyright 2000-2008 Team Rankings, LLC. All rights reserved. All content on this site is produced for entertainment purposes only and is not intended to be used in direct or indirect violation of any local, state, federal, or international law(s). By using this site, you agree and consent to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.